Late on Monday, Apple and Samsung both agreed to drop several patent infringement claims in the companies' California legal battle, according to FOSS Patents. Apple is said to have started the process, filing to drop roughly half of its claims. Five hours later Samsung followed suit, offering drop five out of 12 patents, but still arguing that Apple's case is too large to go to trial in the summer. In its filing Apple accused Samsung of being uncooperative.Apple is believed to be in a rush to slow down Samsung. It alleges that Samsung has now become number one in global smartphone sales as a result of infringement, and that Apple is at this point owed billions of dollars in damages. "While the parties have been readying the case for trial Samsung has vaulted into first place in worldwide sales of smartphones, with massive sales of its copycat products," Apple's court documents read, referring to a Washington Post article. "Samsung's infringement of Apple's intellectual property has already resulted in damages that reach billions of dollars.
View the Original article
уторак, 8. мај 2012.
Apple, Samsung narrow patent claims in California lawsuits
петак, 13. април 2012.
California senate bill would need warrant for GPS info
A new bill introduced in California would restrict government tracking of cellphones without a warrant, the LA Times reported. State Senator Mark Leno introduced SB 1434 as a proposed amendment to the Penal Code. Leno believes that the state government's laws aren't reflecting the newly available technology and access to the sensitive location information isn't adequately supervised.If passed in its entirety into law, the bill would also limit search warrants to no longer than is needed, and never longer than 30 days. The state Senate policy committee will meet regarding the bill this spring.
Leno's stance is backed by an American Civil Liberties Union audit of law enforcement agencies around the country that found the practice is fairly common without a warrant or subpoena. It's done either using the GPS sensor in a phone or triangulation between cell towers.
Some, including the founding academic director of the Center on Law and Information Policy at Fordham University Joel Reidenberg, believe such tracking may even violate the first amendment that protects the freedom of association of US citizens.
The precedent-setting US Supreme Court case of United States vs. Jones ruled that tracking movements using a device is comparable to trespassing on private property, although cellphones aren't necessarily covered as they don't necessarily require extra tracking hardware.
By Electronista Staffprintemail(2)
TAGS :
industry, mobile phonesShare the Article
FacebookTwitterDeliousSlash DotDiggRelated ArticlesCongress tweaks bill to aid unlicensed white space wireless FBI issues warrant to Google to force Android phone unlockSenator Franken blasts Google, Facebook over privacy policyNew Broadcom GPS chip has 10X better position lock-insFord starts shipping MyFord Touch 2 updatesAmendment to block Facebook password requests shot down MacMall to open first retail store outside of CaliforniaRecent ArticlesValve veteran details wearable computing projectReport: Apple considered investing in Sharp for LCD techNokia posts Lumia 900 data fix bug three days earlyCanon warns of EOS 5D Mark III bug skewing exposureRumors: BBM seen on iOS/Android, BlackBerry PlayBook 4G soonAT&T, Reebok, Intel to release branded Spotify appsApple denies product with Starck, yacht more likely insteadPanasonic Eluga ships in GermanyLenovo to ship ThinkPad L430, L530 notebooks in JuneNext Xbox rumored to have 16-core processorSamsung says Windows Phone 8 devices due late 2012Other Articles
togglePrevious Comments
Comment buried. ShowMakosukeFresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Aug 2001
-104/12, 08:10pmView the Original article